HISTORY OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS WARRANTED GUY'S EXCLUSION
After the New York County Supreme Court gave the wife exclusive occupancy of the marital residence (temporarily), pending trial, the husband appealed.
And upon its review, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that there was a “history of protective orders,” involving the parties. Given the level of police involvement, and the underlying “domestic strife,” the AD1 “unanimously affirmed” the order, as it was needed to “ensure the personal safety of the parties.”
Think they were playing safe there?
# # #
DECISION